Designing a customer-facing content enablement toolkit

Making onboarding, education, and troubleshooting resources easier to find — and easier to use

The context

Over time, Backlog and Cacoo built up a lot of genuinely helpful customer-facing resources: Learn content, setup guides, workflow education, and Help Center articles.

The problem wasn’t quality. It was accessibility.

Customer-facing teams often needed to solve the same customer problems repeatedly — onboarding, first-time setup, common workflows, “how do I…?” questions — but the best resources weren’t centralized. Finding the right link was often dependent on individual memory, ad-hoc searching, or asking someone who “knew where it lived.”

When content is hard to find internally, teams don’t stop needing it — they just recreate it in real time.

The problem

High-quality resources existed, but there wasn’t a single place customer-facing teams could rely on.

That created predictable friction:

  • teams spent time searching across multiple sources

  • guidance varied depending on who responded

  • the same content requests repeated across teams

  • strong self-serve pathways existed, but weren’t consistently used

What was missing wasn’t more content — it was a usable enablement layer.

What I owned

I created an internal Customer-Facing Content Enablement Toolkit to centralize and standardize the best learning and setup resources for customer-facing teams.

I owned the toolkit end-to-end, including:

  • identifying which existing resources were highest leverage for onboarding and product success

  • organizing those resources into a centralized internal hub

  • structuring the toolkit so teams could quickly match common customer needs to the right content

  • writing or refining supporting context so the toolkit could be used without additional explanation

  • ensuring it functioned as enablement infrastructure — not just a list of links

What the toolkit included

The toolkit centralized resources intended to support:

  • onboarding and first-time setup

  • common workflows and use cases

  • feature education and adoption guidance

  • troubleshooting and self-serve support pathways

  • internal consistency around which resources teams should rely on in customer conversations

The goal was to help teams guide customers toward proven self-serve learning paths — instead of reinventing the same explanations each time.

How it worked in practice

Customer-facing teams could use the toolkit to:

  • quickly locate the best existing content for a customer’s situation

  • share consistent onboarding and learning paths across Sales, Support, and Customer Success

  • reduce time spent searching across scattered sources

  • route customers to self-serve content that supported adoption and troubleshooting

This made the content ecosystem more usable internally — and made the customer experience more consistent externally.

What this enabled

This project created internal structure for using content as customer enablement infrastructure.

It supported:

  • more consistent onboarding guidance across teams

  • easier access to proven workflows and educational resources

  • clearer internal “source of truth” for what to share with customers

  • a repeatable way to match customer needs to the right learning assets

It didn’t require new tools or a major overhaul — it was a practical system built on top of content that already existed.

What this shows about how I work

This case study reflects the way I approach content beyond acquisition:

  • I treat content as something teams should be able to rely on, not rediscover

  • I design for reuse, consistency, and self-serve enablement

  • I build systems that reduce friction and prevent repeated work

  • I focus on operational clarity — making the right thing easy to find and easy to use

When content becomes dependable internally, it becomes more effective externally — because customers get clearer guidance, faster.

Previous
Previous

Scaling a template library into a demand-validated content system

Next
Next

Designing content teams could actually rely on